I atgree with ‘ chip’. This is way too binary. Like much of this ‘motivatonal’ twaddle, it comes from an arrogant perspective of superiority . Hey ‘ TotalSelfConfidence.net’ – get over yourself.
To the contrary, I’m surprised how many I can think of who fit in the left or the right. But I believe the purpose of this image and any image is for the view to use their imagination. The words are giving a general depiction of characteristics. You can choose to interpret it as rigid, but as I said, I actually know a handful of people who could fit into one of the halves.
i disagree with this because it’s too digital an image…human beings are analog, not digital….i think the norm would be plasicity in personality, perceptions, etc…anyway, i just find it too rigid and i’ve never met anyone either fully on left side or right, like this image demonstrates
I atgree with ‘ chip’. This is way too binary. Like much of this ‘motivatonal’ twaddle, it comes from an arrogant perspective of superiority . Hey ‘ TotalSelfConfidence.net’ – get over yourself.
LikeLike
Very interesting .
LikeLike
Need this in a poster!
No one is ever all to one side
LikeLike
To the contrary, I’m surprised how many I can think of who fit in the left or the right. But I believe the purpose of this image and any image is for the view to use their imagination. The words are giving a general depiction of characteristics. You can choose to interpret it as rigid, but as I said, I actually know a handful of people who could fit into one of the halves.
LikeLike
i disagree with this because it’s too digital an image…human beings are analog, not digital….i think the norm would be plasicity in personality, perceptions, etc…anyway, i just find it too rigid and i’ve never met anyone either fully on left side or right, like this image demonstrates
LikeLike